Censoring Peace

Over the past several months I’ve felt like we’re living in one of my stories.  As a writer, let me be the first to say that although I find it a fun place to visit, you don’t want to live there….

Recent events are chock full of the potentiality to frighten people, anger them, and divide them.  The division, a tactic opponents use to help them conquer, perpetuates the fear and anger.  The pot is being stirred, and in all this chaos, folks can continue to be worked up, or they can find a way to experience peace.

I choose peace.

Peace doesn’t mean rolling over and sticking your head in the sand, however.  The most recent event that looms very threateningly is the ready application of censorship.  As a writer, I have a strong opinion on that subject:  Censorship is wrong.  There’s a reason Voltaire’s attitude was encompassed as “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.”  Censorship is like a cancer because it spreads.  First one group will be silenced, and then another group, and then another….

What is considered to be on the right side or the wrong side changes as the tide turns within the culture.  Those who think it’s good to silence voices that oppose them need to be aware of the proverb to be careful about what you wish for.  That which they championed might one day be used against them.

And what begins as censorship leads to worse forms of oppression.  I don’t think I can express it any more eloquently than the poet Gwyn Thomas did:

Books burning in the fire.

The horror of the burning is

As ever, as ever, a sign.

In the night, round about, there are bright eyes

Full of the passion of destruction …


People in the fire.

Yeah, this is a heavier post than my usual stuff, but if we want peace, we must not be silenced….

2 thoughts on “Censoring Peace

  1. Hey, I’m with you on the evils of censorship. It might be a short-term solution, but it’s the kind that truly causes more grief than it’s worth.

    I hope they sort out the social media issues soon, or they’re likely to find that someone will set up their own servers, and then whatever influence the big media companies once had will be toast.

    But it’s a difficult, tricky situation. I don’t know if you’ve ever been on Bitchute, but it’s a video alternative to YouTube. I tried going there once, but all the white supremacist posts made me feel like I needed to wash my eyeballs. Ick. And that was just reading the little thumbnails. I’m sure the actual videos were much worse.

    Scott Adams, the cartoonist who created Dilbert, actually had an interesting solution, although I think it first came from the CEO of Twitter, of all places. Anyway, this idea was to allow people to choose their own filters. That way, no one has to wade through porn (double ick), to see funny cat videos. (Yes, I really am that pedestrian. Or maybe I just like cats.)

    But one thing I am clear on–allowing others to make these decisions for us is not a good idea. I don’t know if the above solution is The One, but there needs to be something. The current situation doesn’t strike me as sustainable.

    Thanks so much for having the courage to post this. : )

    Liked by 1 person

    • About the most I can add to what you said is “Amen, sister!” Hadn’t heard of all the details you shared, but the choose-your-own filter seems like a good idea. There are some things you can’t ‘unsee’…!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s