
Little Molly told her mother, “My stomach hurts.”
“That’s because you haven’t eaten lunch,” Mama replied. “Your stomach is empty, and you’d feel better if you had something in it.”
That afternoon Daddy come home early from work, and during dinner remarked how he had been plagued all day by a headache.
“That’s because it’s empty,” said Molly. “You’d feel better if you had something in it.”
Perhaps you’ve heard of the info dump. Sometimes, while penning a story, the writer needs to sort of bring the reader up to speed. It can be tempting to unload a chunk of the backstory in your head onto the page, but that can make the tale start to stagger.
Dialogue is one good way to circumvent this challenge, but the writer still needs to beware. It doesn’t ring true when a couple of characters inform each other of details they already have knowledge of:
Little Molly told her mother, “My stomach hurts.”
“Well, as you know, Molly,” said Mama, “I haven’t been able to serve lunch yet because I’m preparing for our trip across the country. That won’t be easy since we’re going to haul three goats, two donkeys, and a truckload of chickens so Grandpa can replace his livestock that were abducted by aliens.”
There are better ways to explain why this family is preparing for a zany adventure involving farm animals and extraterrestrials. They could discuss plans during dinner. They might explain their motive to a helpful (?) stranger at a rest stop. Or the story can simply unfold, dropping nuggets of information like, well, droppings scattered along the highway (What else would you expect with three goats, two donkeys, and a whole heap of chickens?).
But you’re probably already familiar with how to avoid expository dialogue, so I’ll leave the matter here. After all, my head is starting to hurt….